Home

  1. Introduction
  2. Graphing Distributions
  3. Summarizing Distributions
  4. Describing Bivariate Data
  5. Probability
  6. Research Design
  7. Normal Distribution
  8. Advanced Graphs
  9. Sampling Distributions
  10. Estimation
  11. Logic of Hypothesis Testing
  12. Tests of Means
  13. Power
  14. Regression
  15. Analysis of Variance
  16. Transformations
  17. Chi Square
  18. Distribution Free Tests
  19. Effect Size

  20. Case Studies
    1. Contents
      Standard
    2. Angry Moods
      Standard
    3. Flatulence
      Standard
    4. Physicians Reactions
      Standard
    5. Teacher Ratings
      Standard
    6. Diet and Health
      Standard
    7. Smiles and Leniency
      Standard
    8. Animal Research
      Standard
    9. ADHD Treatment
      Standard
    10. Weapons and Aggression
      Standard
    11. SAT and College GPA
      Standard
    12. Stereograms
      Standard
    13. Driving
      Standard
    14. Stroop Interference
      Standard
    15. TV Violence
      Standard
    16. Obesity and Bias
      Standard
    17. Shaking and Stirring Martinis
      Standard
    18. Adolescent Lifestyle Choices
      Standard
    19. Chocolate and Body Weight
      Standard
    20. Bedroom TV and Hispanic Children
      Standard
    21. Weight and Sleep Apnea
      Standard
    22. Misusing SEM
      Standard
    23. School Gardens and Vegetable Consumption
      Standard
    24. TV and Hypertension
      Standard
    25. Dietary Supplements
      Standard
    26. Young People and Binge Drinking
      Standard  
    27. Sugar Consumption in the US Diet
      Standard
    28. Nutrition Information Sources and Older Adults
      Standard
    29. Mind Set Exercise and the Placebo Effect
      Standard
    30. Predicting Present and Future Affect
      Standard
    31. Exercise and Memory
      Standard
    32. Parental Recognition of Child Obesity
      Standard
    33. Educational Attainment and Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparity
      Standard

  21. Calculators
  22. Glossary
  Young People and Binge Drinking

Research conducted by: Richard O. de Visser and Julian D. Birch

Case study prepared by: Robert F. Houser and Georgette Baghdady



Overview
Binge drinking is a serious public health problem bringing harm to both the individual and society. It compromises a person's health, increasing the risk of many diseases, injury, and death. It also results in a greater incidence of motor vehicle crashes, violence, the spread of sexually-transmitted diseases, and unintended pregnancies. Binge drinking is prevalent among both young and older adults, men and women, and high and low income levels. Governments have formulated guidelines for moderate or sensible drinking levels. The government of the United Kingdom (UK) issued guidelines for sensible drinking as 2-3 alcohol units per day for women and 3-4 units per day for men, an alcohol unit being 10 milliliters of ethanol. A binge drinking episode is when a person drinks above double the recommended daily guidelines in a short period of time.

Questions to Answer
What can we learn about the binge drinking patterns of university students in England? Do the bingers and non-bingers differ in their knowledge of the sensible drinking guidelines issued by the UK government?

Design Issues
The university students in the sample "self-selected" to participate in the study by responding to recruiting efforts made via email messages and requests in lectures.

Descriptions of Variables
Variable Description
Sex Female or male

mo_binge_n

Number of times the university students did binge drinking in the last month (using sex-specific definitions)
modrunk Number of times the university students drank in the last month
wk_unit_prop Familiarity with alcohol unit-based guidelines (measured on a 5-point scale)
k_unit_sum Knowledge of alcohol unit-based guidelines
(score out of 7)
u_fam Familiarity with alcohol unit-based guidelines
(measured on a 5-point scale)


References

de Visser, R. O., Birch, J. D. (2012). My cup runneth over:Young people's lack of knowledge of low-risk drinking guidelines. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31, 206-212.

 


Links
Exercises
Please read the de Visser et al. article first, and then perform the exercises using the data set. For all analyses, statistical significance is based on p<0.05.
  1. How is an alcohol unit operationally defined?
  2. What is the authors' operational definition of binge drinking?
  3. What percentage of the university students in the study sample did binge drinking in the last month?
  4. Perform a histogram of the binge drinking variable for university students. Describe the shape of the distribution.
  5. Perform a stem and leaf graph of the binging variable.
  6. Other studies have found that most binge drinkers are men. Does this study of university students bear evidence of this?
  7. Perform a correlation between the number of times university students binge drank in the last month and the number of times they drank any amount of alcohol in the last month. Interpret your findings.
  8. Explore the shape of the distribution of the wk_unit_prop variable. What transformation would make the distribution approximately normally distributed?
  9. What is the mean and median number of units consumed in the last week by bingers and non-bingers?
  10. Perform an independent samples t test to compare the number of units consumed in the last week (use the square root-transformed variable for wk_unit_prop) between binge drinkers and non-binge drinkers.
  11. Perform a Wilcoxon rank sum test to compare the number of units consumed in the last week (the wk_unit_prop variable) between binge drinkers and non-binge drinkers.
  12. Other studies have shown that young adults average close to four episodes of binge drinking a month. Does this study show evidence of this?
  13. Do non-bingers have better knowledge of unit-based drinking guidelines than bingers?
  14. Are non-bingers more familiar with unit-based drinking guidelines than bingers?
  15. How might the practical utility of sensible alcohol guidelines be promoted?