Home

  1. Introduction
  2. Graphing Distributions
  3. Summarizing Distributions
  4. Describing Bivariate Data
  5. Probability
  6. Research Design
  7. Normal Distribution
  8. Advanced Graphs
  9. Sampling Distributions
  10. Estimation
  11. Logic of Hypothesis Testing
  12. Tests of Means
  13. Power
  14. Regression
  15. Analysis of Variance
  16. Transformations
  17. Chi Square
  18. Distribution Free Tests
  19. Effect Size

  20. Case Studies
    1. Contents
      Standard
    2. Angry Moods
      Standard
    3. Flatulence
      Standard
    4. Physicians Reactions
      Standard
    5. Teacher Ratings
      Standard  
    6. Diet and Health
      Standard
    7. Smiles and Leniency
      Standard
    8. Animal Research
      Standard
    9. ADHD Treatment
      Standard
    10. Weapons and Aggression
      Standard
    11. SAT and College GPA
      Standard
    12. Stereograms
      Standard
    13. Driving
      Standard
    14. Stroop Interference
      Standard
    15. TV Violence
      Standard
    16. Obesity and Bias
      Standard
    17. Shaking and Stirring Martinis
      Standard
    18. Adolescent Lifestyle Choices
      Standard
    19. Chocolate and Body Weight
      Standard
    20. Bedroom TV and Hispanic Children
      Standard
    21. Weight and Sleep Apnea
      Standard
    22. Misusing SEM
      Standard
    23. School Gardens and Vegetable Consumption
      Standard
    24. TV and Hypertension
      Standard
    25. Dietary Supplements
      Standard
    26. Young People and Binge Drinking
      Standard
    27. Sugar Consumption in the US Diet
      Standard
    28. Nutrition Information Sources and Older Adults
      Standard
    29. Mind Set Exercise and the Placebo Effect
      Standard
    30. Predicting Present and Future Affect
      Standard
    31. Exercise and Memory
      Standard
    32. Parental Recognition of Child Obesity
      Standard
    33. Educational Attainment and Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparity
      Standard

  21. Calculators
  22. Glossary
  Teacher Ratings

Research conducted by: Annette Towler and Robert Dipboye

Case study prepared by: Emily Zitek

Overview

How powerful are rumors? Frequently, students ask friends and/or look at instructor evaluations to decide if a class is worth taking. Kelley (1950) found that instructor reputation has a profound impact on actual teaching ratings, and Towler and Dipboye (1998) replicated and extended this study.

Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. Before viewing the lecture, students were given a summary of the instructors' prior teaching evaluations. There were two conditions: Charismatic instructor and Punitive instructor.

Then all subjects watched the same twenty-minute lecture given by the exact same lecturer. Following the lecture, subjects answered three questions about the leadership qualities of the lecturer. A summary rating score was computed and used as the variable "rating" here.



Questions to Answer
Does an instructor's prior reputation affect student ratings?

Design Issues
The data presented here are part of a larger study. See the references below to learn more.

Descriptions of Variables
Variable Description
Condition this represents the content of the description that the students were given about the professor (1 = charismatic, 2 = punitive)
Rating how favorably the subjects rated the professor after hearing the lecture (higher ratings are more favorable)


References

Kelley, H. H.(1950). The warm-cold variable in first impression of persons. Journal of Personality, 18, 431-439.

Towler, A., & Dipboye, R. L. (1998). The effect of instructor reputation and need for cognition on student behavior (poster presented at American Psychological Society conference, May 1998).


Links

Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance by Louisa Coburn


Exercises
  1. What is the independent variable in this study?
  2. Plot stem and leaf displays of the ratings for each condition.
  3. What is the standard deviation of the ratings in the charismatic-reputation condition? What is the standard deviation of the ratings in the punitive-reputation condition?
  4. Plot side-by-side box plots for the ratings by condition.
  5. In which of the two conditions are there outliers?
  6. Conduct an independent-samples t-test to examine the difference between the mean ratings of the charismatic-reputation condition and the punitive-reputation condition. Is the difference in mean ratings statistically significant? What can you conclude?
  7. Compute a confidence interval on the difference between the means of the two conditions.